Skip to content
Compliance · Service Interception

Prevent bad reviews before they happen — 100% EU-legal.

We intercept issues during the guest experience. Not after. Not a review gate. Real service — with legal compliance as a byproduct.

The legal situation

Review gating is illegal. Many competitors do it anyway.

Under the FTC Review Rule (16 CFR Part 465, effective October 2024) and the EU Omnibus Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/2161), pre-screening customers based on predicted sentiment and only soliciting reviews from the happy ones is review gating — and it's unlawful. Google Business Profile ToS explicitly prohibits it. The FTC issues penalties of up to $51,744 per violation.

What gating looks like

  • • "Were you happy?" survey → only happy guests see the review link
  • • 5-star raters get Google, 1-2 star raters get a private form
  • • Discounts tied to leaving positive reviews
  • • Sentiment-predicting AI filters who gets asked

What Fotiqo does instead

  • • Asks every guest during the stay: "Is anything broken?"
  • • AI resolves or escalates real problems in real time
  • • Sends an identical 4-button review request to every customer afterward
  • • Logs every send to an immutable audit trail

Fashion Nova LLC paid a $4.2M FTC settlement in 2022 for review suppression. The practice you outsource to a "reputation tool" could be the one that costs you Google Maps visibility, FTC exposure, and an EU Omnibus fine up to 4% of annual turnover. Fotiqo is built so you never take that bet.

How it works

Service Interception in 5 steps

A structured upstream-service layer that turns "problems before reviews" into a product feature.

1

Trigger

Service Check is triggered by a configurable event — photo delivery, gallery first-view, download click, mid-experience time window, or post-experience.

2

AI-generated Service Check

Delivered via the customer's preferred channel (WhatsApp or Email, detected at booking). Template-validated to never use gating language — 'review', 'rating', 'happy?', 'satisfied?' are forbidden; regex blocks them before send.

3

Customer reports (or doesn't)

Guests who report issues get routed to a resolution flow. Guests with no complaints continue their experience — neither group is treated differently for review purposes.

4

AI resolves, or staff escalate

Small issues (missing photo, download error, wrong guest name) → AI fixes directly. Larger issues (service complaint, refund request) → routed to staff with an SLA timer and full context.

5

Review request sent — to ALL

Once the experience ends, every customer receives the same 4-button review request (Google, TripAdvisor, Facebook, Private Feedback). Identical content, identical buttons, identical weight. ComplianceAuditLog records every send.

Case study

PixelHoliday prevented 200+ negative reviews in 6 months.

Illustrative figure pending final telemetry from PixelHoliday's 2026 Q1 pilot.

// TODO: real count
Service Checks sent
// TODO: real count
Issues resolved upstream
// TODO: real data
Average time-to-resolution
“We stopped having the 3am water-slide refund call. The Service Check catches broken towels, missing photos, wrong room service — and our Google rating went from 3.9 to 4.6 without changing how we solicit reviews. We just solved more problems, faster.”
— Operations lead, PixelHoliday (placeholder quote, pending approval)
Unique to Fotiqo

No competitor ships this.

Trustindex, Birdeye, and Podium all offer review solicitation. None of them solve the upstream problem — they all assume the stay already happened and the review request is the only lever. That's the exact framing the FTC targeted in Fashion Nova v. FTC:

“Fashion Nova blocked hundreds of thousands of lower-starred, negative reviews from being posted on its website. The settlement required Fashion Nova to pay $4.2 million — the first FTC case challenging a company's suppression of honest customer reviews.”
FTC press release, 25 January 2022 — as cited in COMPLIANCE.md §1.1

Service Interception flips the model. We don't suppress anything — we resolve the cause before a review is warranted. That's a defensible operations layer under EU UCPD and US FTC rules, not a gray-area growth hack.

What this means for you

  • Google Business profile stays safe — no ToS violation risk
  • FTC + EU Omnibus defensible — every send logged 6 years
  • Better actual service — issues resolved, not hidden
  • Ratings genuinely improve — because guests actually had a better time

Compliance as a product feature. Not a gamble.

Book a demo and we'll walk you through the full Service Interception flow on live data — Service Check templates, resolution SLA, and the audit log a regulator would see.